Cheapest high speed wireless internet service

In the five French cities that the Center studied, residents have a choice of at least six providers for high-speed internet access. Most residents have to choose between one company that offers internet via cable and another via DSL, or a fast telephone line. The two companiesвЂ™ service areas rarely overlapД¬overage areas in other US cities the Center mapped are similar. with a choice of just two internet providers. That leaves the vast majority of residents in the metropolitan area that's home to tech giant Microsoft Corp. The two companiesвЂ™ service areas rarely overlap. Frontier Communications serves residents north of the city, and covers just 29 percent of the metro area. While Comcast serves 95 percent of the Seattle metro area, CenturyLink only offers service in a territory south of the city, to about 31 percent of the areaвЂ™s residents, according to data compiled by the Federal Communications Commission and mapped by the Center for Public Integrity. The area boasts three providers who offer residents internet service of more than 10 megabits per second: Comcast, CenturyLink and Frontier Communications.Д«ut no Seattle resident has a choice of all three. When it comes to shopping for internet service, most Americans donвЂ™t have much of a choice.Д¬onsider the Seattle, Washington, metropolitan area, which includes Bellevue, Tacoma, and Redmond. And for the unconnected, the increasing gap will be measured in fewer economic opportunities, less access to healthcare, and other inequities. The high prices and lack of competition in towns like these - and there are many - add to a growing divide between the connected and unconnected. Rather, itвЂ™s a snapshot meant to show the state of broadband for some American cities. The CenterвЂ™s research isnвЂ™t as comprehensive. Many studies have been conducted looking at price and competition. 'Just like we today expect clean running water, sewage and electricity as essential, so is broadband necessary to partake in society, to interact with government, to learn, to inform and be informed, to be a fully functioning member of society,' said Rudolf van der Berg, a telecommunications and broadband policy analyst who studies policy at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). President Barack Obama this year called for faster, more affordable internet service for everyone. Telecom companies appear to carve up territory to avoid competingДЄccording to data in a report by the US National Technology and Information Administration, more than 8 percent of US households say they cannot afford broadband. They make it difficult for low- to middle-income families to afford fast internet service, which has become a necessity for job training, education, health care. Higher broadband prices donвЂ™t just mean fewer dollars in AmericansвЂ™ wallets at the end of every month.

The CenterвЂ™s analysis echoes the findings of several studies on internet pricing disparities worldwide.Д«y mapping the service areas of US providers, The Center for Public Integrity also found that telecommunications companies appear to carve up territory to avoid competing with more than one other provider.

The analysis shows that consumers in France have a choice between a far greater number of providers - seven on average - than those in the US, where most residents can get service from no more than two companies. A Center for Public Integrity analysis of internet prices in five US cities and five comparable French cities found that prices in the US were as much as 3.5 times higher than those in France for similar service.

Cheapest high speed wireless internet service